Welcome to the Functional Programming Zulip Chat Archive. You can join the chat here.
Halp. mtl abuses me. Is it advisable to use Polysemy on GHC 8.6 at all?
Yea, for a web app backend with reasonable/moderate user base.
can't you just scale up :wink:
I guess I just want to know whether it will be "it will be slow, but not very noticeable" or "it will be terribly slow; just don't do it. i said no"
and, if there is any "oh, btw, on ghc 8.6 XYZ won't work"
I've only used it on 8.6, so I have no comparison. also very little eperformance demand
ok, I haven't seen anything that didn't work
btw I just spotted you on #nix:matrix.org :smiley:
yea I joined to bridge with irc
I think one point of the split of #[email protected] and #nix:matrix is that the features of matrix don't look very nice when bridging
polysemy is so freaking eassyyyyyyyy to use. so long ... mtl ...
yeah it's mindboggling
doesn't network+io+db operations far outweigh everything else usually?
I wouldn't expect polysemy to behave much differently on 8.6 when it comes to performance, compared to 8.8