Does stack runghc not already respect package.yaml? I thought any Stack command would do so if run within a Stack project directory.
default-extensions are definitely not considered. I do not know if dependencies are because I do not even get that far in the compilation process thanks to default-extensions not being considered.
what do you mean by "interpret instead of compiling"?
I mean what ghci does as opposed to what ghc does.
Which part of what ghci does do you need? Afaiu (although I could be completely wrong, since I haven't read any direct topic on the subject), ghci still compiles code, but in a more specific way, and then gives you interactive access to that code (hence why you can't run anything from a module that doesn't compile, even if the particular thing you want to run is fine).
in any case, if you want to run with a ghci style, while also reading your project config, maybe writing something like a .ghci file with just main in it and then running stack ghci might work?
How do I make
stack runinterpret instead of compiling? Or alternatively, how do I makestack runghc app/Main.hsrespectpackage.yaml?Does
stack runghcnot already respectpackage.yaml? I thought any Stack command would do so if run within a Stack project directory.what do you mean by "interpret instead of compiling"?
stack runghcis probably something liikestack exec -- runghcso I'd assume it ignores project configGeorgi Lyubenov // googleson78 said:
I mean what
ghcidoes as opposed to whatghcdoes.bradrn said:
default-extensionsare definitely not considered. I do not know if dependencies are because I do not even get that far in the compilation process thanks todefault-extensionsnot being considered.I’m not sure how this follows… e.g.
stack exec -- ghcicertainly respects project config insofar as it lets me use non-basedependencies.rednaZ said:
Which part of what ghci does do you need? Afaiu (although I could be completely wrong, since I haven't read any direct topic on the subject), ghci still compiles code, but in a more specific way, and then gives you interactive access to that code (hence why you can't run anything from a module that doesn't compile, even if the particular thing you want to run is fine).
but what does byte-code mean? :sweat_smile:
I haven't heard of a VM for hs
unless it's something very specialised and the VM is the interpreter
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/blob/master/rts/Interpreter.c
well, I guess I was wrong
but then why can't we load individual functions? :triumph:
in any case, if you want to run with a
ghcistyle, while also reading your project config, maybe writing something like a.ghcifile with justmainin it and then runningstack ghcimight work?Isn’t this pretty much exactly what
stack runghcdoes?