Welcome to the Functional Programming Zulip Chat Archive. You can join the chat here.
Is it possible? It's so annoying!
????
what possible use do you have for stack if you don't want it to use stackage?
Prolly something tooling related
Cabal os a nightmare on Arch Linux so I use stack! But it annoys me when I need to put things on extra-deps
:frown:
So stackage, or rather a stack LTS (e.g. LTS-15.5) is just a set of packages along with versions for each package, which are known to "work together". You still get your packages from hackage. So I'm not quite sure what you mean to do/achieve.
stackage
I would like stack to go get the packages from hackage directly
Or just know a way to do it
But I now get that it seems not doable
extra-deps is quite useful. Is there a reason that it annoys you? (I use it a lot but maybe I shouldn't...)
extra-deps
It only annoys me when I need to specify package that depends on others that I need to specify on extra-deps :confused:
Is it possible? It's so annoying!
????
what possible use do you have for stack if you don't want it to use stackage?
Prolly something tooling related
Cabal os a nightmare on Arch Linux so I use stack! But it annoys me when I need to put things on extra-deps
:frown:
So
stackage
, or rather a stack LTS (e.g. LTS-15.5) is just a set of packages along with versions for each package, which are known to "work together". You still get your packages from hackage. So I'm not quite sure what you mean to do/achieve.I would like stack to go get the packages from hackage directly
Or just know a way to do it
But I now get that it seems not doable
extra-deps
is quite useful. Is there a reason that it annoys you? (I use it a lot but maybe I shouldn't...)It only annoys me when I need to specify package that depends on others that I need to specify on extra-deps :confused: